Dear Editor:
Reading Peter Beinart again showing his antipathy towards Israel with his latest screed, "American Needs to Start Telling the Truth About Israel's Nukes," one can't help but think he might be less unconvincing if he wrote about some of the related things America - and Beinart and The New York Times - actually should start telling the truth about, such as Iran's nuclear weapons program and its continual cheating on the JCPOA from the very beginning, the provisions of the Hamas charter calling not just for the destruction of Israel but the murder of Jews throughout the world - even those like Beinart who act as useful idiots, the similar provisions in the still unchanged PLO charter, the way Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of Fatah, the PLO and the PA who is routinely falsely referred to as "moderate," has explicitly rejected the very core concept of the so-called "two-state solution," and various other incontrovertible facts which Beinart and The Times find inconvenient because they disprove the false narratives they push.
As far at the truth about Israel's "nukes," probably almost as many people believe Israel possesses nuclear weapons as believed Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Does Beinart, who's generally wrong about Israel with almost all of his pompous proclamations, really know the truth? Color me skeptical.
Sincerely,
Alan Stein